Exonerating Stalin
For a certain species of lowbrow anti-Semite – or, at
any rate, people who present themselves as anti-Semites – every bad actor in
culture, politics, and business must be a Jew. Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight
Eisenhower, David Rockefeller, and even Stephen Colbert have all been accused
of being crypto-Jews. “All serial killers, pedophiles, organ harvesters,
usurers, and terrorists are Jewish,” the blog Shadow Masterminds claimed
in 2013, for one egregious example of this phenomenon [1]. The natural effect
of such gross exaggeration, whatever its intent, is to taint, trivialize, and
discredit more reasonable criticisms of Zionism or forms of criminality in
which Jews play a disproportionate role. I recently came across a particularly
stupid specimen of the genre, and one too laughable not to share. In “Stalin the Crypto-Jew”, Fitzpatrick Informer contributor “Josh” dramatically points
the finger at the Soviet Union’s Man of Steel.
At the top of the post is a photo collage of Stalin
and other figures striking a Napoleonic pose, with one hand tucked into their
coats – evidencing the omnipresent “Masonic Hidden Hand” by way of the “Sign of
the Master of the Second Veil”, the caption reads. Less ominously, however, “the
hidden hand was a feature of some statues of the ancient Greeks and Romans and […]
later painters based their poses on classical models,” explains Tom Holmberg:
The pose was recommended
by certain classical writers as a useful posture for orators. Aeschines of
Macedon (390-331 B.C.), an actor, orator and founder of a school of rhetoric,
who wrote an important book on oratory, postulated that speaking with one’s arm
outside the toga was considered ill-mannered. A number of textbooks on oratory
published in the eighteenth century, following Aeschines, recommended this
gesture. [2]
“Josh” next highlights the Jewish Virtual Library’s
claim that Stalin’s birthplace, the Georgian city of Gori, was “home to one of
the largest Georgian Jewish populations of the time”, following this up with Edvard
Radzinsky’s details that Stalin’s mother had a Jewish friend and that she “often
worked […] in the houses of rich Jewish traders.” “Josh” strategically omits these
key passages from the same source:
As a small child Soso
[i.e., Stalin] was given his first lessons in malice toward the Jews by his father.
[…]
To the end of his days he
went on naively settling accounts with his poverty-stricken childhood. It was
then, in his childhood, that his beloved mother’s humiliation, their
everlasting hunger, their poverty, sowed hatred and resentment in the morbidly
touchy boy’s mind. Hatred above all for them – those rich Jewish traders. […]
Soso’s feelings were
reinforced by jealousy and resentment. Insulting gossip about his mother and
her visits to the homes of rich Jews made its furtive appearance at this time.
This is how anti-Semitic feelings, so alien to the Caucasus, developed in
little Soso. His friend Davrishevi remembered his grandmother reading the New
Testament to them – the story of Judas’s kiss of betrayal. “‘But why didn’t
Jesus draw his saber?’ little Soso asked indignantly. ‘He couldn’t do that,’
Grandma answered. ‘He had to sacrifice himself for our salvation.’” That was
something little Soso was incapable of understanding. All through his childhood
he had been taught to answer blow with blow. He resolved to do what seemed to
him the obvious thing: to take vengeance on the Jews! Even in those days he was
a good organizer, but he himself remained behind the scenes for fear of his
mother’s heavy hand. One typical plan was carried out by little friends – they
let a pig into the synagogue. They were found out but did not give Soso away.
Shortly afterward an Orthodox priest told his parishioners in church, “There
are those among us, some lost sheep, who a few days ago committed a sacrilege
in one of God’s houses.” That was quite beyond Soso’s understanding. How could
anyone defend people of another faith?! [3]
"Josh" spies a kiddie cup at Stalin's mother's grave. |
“Josh” next visits the cemetery where Stalin’s mother is buried, linking to a Russian-language message board with the claim, “Stalin’s mother’s grave has a Jewish Shabbat Kiddish [sic] cup covered with a shroud. This is a standard mark for a buried Jew”; but, as Jennifer Geraghty-Gorman explains in a post at her cemetery blog Over Thy Dead Body, the representation is not of a kiddush cup or wine goblet, but an urn:
In many cemeteries you
will find stones with urns atop them. The urn is a classic Greek and Roman
symbol of mourning. With the body viewed as a vessel of the soul, the urn holds
the cremated remains so that the soul might ascend to Heaven. The ancient
Romans used the urn as a repository for the ashes of the dead, and it was
always shrouded out of respect. The urn is a very popular symbol of mourning in
Victorian cemeteries, and [Dublin’s] Mount Jerome is no exception […] [4]
As for Stalin’s father, “Josh” links to a Russian blog
post asserting that the B’nai B’rith Messenger acknowledged Stalin’s
Jewish origins in its issue of March 3, 1950. Fitzpatrick Informer proprietor
Timothy Fitzpatrick himself chimes in with a comment under the post,
reiterating: “Speaking of B’nai B’rith, let me remind you that in the official
journal of this organization, the Bulletin of B’nai B’rith, David Weissman
directly described that Stalin was a Jew (March 3, 1950).” Neither “Josh” nor
Fitzpatrick appears to have consulted the Weissman column they cite, which
reads in context:
A former Soviet General
claims that Joseph Stalin is of Jewish ancestry. (Remember the fascists in this
country who tried to Judaize Franklin Delano Roosevelt? Same type of mentality).
Bet a dollar that the guys who’ll throw it up to us, will forget that Jesus
Christ was also a Jew. [5]
Then “Josh” quotes Soviet apologist Louis Levine’s
boast in the November 1946 issue of the Stalinist propaganda organ Soviet
Russia Today that “Jewish people are unanimous in their love for Stalin.”
Humorously, Anatoliy Golitsyn, a goofy Soviet defector and conspiracy-peddler whose
anti-communist work The Perestroika Deception Fitzpatrick is fond of
recommending, says of the postwar period in which Levine was writing that, “Anti-Semitism
became for a while official Party and government policy.” [6] In the Fitzpatrick
Informer article’s most embarrassing moment, “Josh” links to an anonymous
Gab post attempting to conflate Hasidism, Zionism, and Leninism – wholly ignoring
the tension that existed between the Bolsheviks and the Zionist movement, as
discussed by Guido Goldman in his study Zionism under Soviet Rule (1917-1928).
“Josh” also quotes “Pan-Aryan Alliance” leader Ernest Elmhurst’s 1938 book The
World Hoax for the insight that Stalin “only speaks Yiddish at home”. It
was presumably Elmhurst’s privileged vantage as head waiter at Washington’s Shoreham
Hotel that put him in a position to know the intimate details of Stalin’s life
[7].
“Josh” subsequently excerpts Joseph Bernard Hutton’s 1961
biography Stalin: The Miraculous Georgian for the contested claim that the
“Dzhu” component of Stalin’s original surname, Dzhugashvili, “means ‘Natives of
the Island Dzhu’ and was the actual description given to Israelites.” More plausibly,
Kerry Bolton cites Simon Sebag Montefiore when he “states that the name is
derived either from Ossetian, meaning ‘herd’ or Georgian (djuga) meaning
‘steel’,” adding, “The latter Georgian meaning would surely account for the
adoption of ‘Stalin’, ‘Man of Steel’, by Iosif Vissarionovich.” [8] That Hutton’s
1969 autobiography, On the Other Side of Reality, concerns supernatural
phenomena such as the “spirit surgery” that saved the author’s eyes and “the strange
and frightening facts concerning the mysterious phantom that regularly haunted
the attic of the author’s childhood home”, moreover, does little to enhance his
credentials as a thoroughgoing Stalinologist [9].
Stalin’s alleged Judeophilia, as evidenced by his disastrous
indulgence of the Zionist project in 1948, as well as his alleged
anti-Semitism, as charged by many in relation to the subsequent affair of the Doctors’
Plot, are likely both exaggerated. However, the “dichotomy of the
Stalin/Trotsky split symbolised the clash of two world-outlooks,” Bolton
concludes. “Anti-Stalinism drove the thoughts and actions of many of those who
became the formulators of US foreign policy, which continues to dominate US
thinking.” Further: “Had Stalin been Jewish the shape of the post-1945 world
would have been fundamentally different, and there would have been no real discord
between the USA and the USSR. In short, there would have been no constraint
placed upon American global adventurism.” [10]
Rainer Chlodwig von K.
Rainer is the author of Drugs, Jungles, and Jingoism.
Endnotes
[2] Holmberg, Tom. “Why Is Napoleon Depicted with His
Hand in His Coat?”. The Napoleon Series (July 2013): https://www.napoleon-series.org/faq/c_hand.html
[3] Radzinsky, Edvard. “Stalin: The First In-Depth Biography
Based on Explosive New Documents from Russia’s Secret Archives”. The
Washington Post (1996): https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/stalin.htm
[4] Geraghty-Gorman, Jennifer. “Tombstone Tuesday:
Urns: Classic, Shrouded, and Heavily Cloaked”. “Over Thy Dead Body”: A
Cemetery Blog (December 14, 2010): http://stiffsandstones.blogspot.com/2010/12/tombstone-tuesday-urns-classic-shrouded.html
[5] Weissman, David. “Here’s the Point”. B’nai B’rith
Messenger (March 3, 1950), p. 5.
[6] Golitsyn, Anatoliy. The Perestroika Deception.
New York, NY: Edward Harle Limited, 1995, p. 76.
[7] https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Frederick_Elmhurst
[8] Bolton, Kerry. “Was Stalin Jewish, and Does It
Matter?” Counter-Currents (November 26, 2012): https://counter-currents.com/2012/11/was-stalin-jewish-and-does-it-matter/
[9] https://archive.org/details/onothersideofrea00hutt/page/n259/mode/2up
[10] Bolton, Kerry. “Was Stalin Jewish, and Does It
Matter?” Counter-Currents (November 26, 2012): https://counter-currents.com/2012/11/was-stalin-jewish-and-does-it-matter/
“Had Stalin been Jewish the shape of the post-1945 world would have been fundamentally different, and there would have been no real discord between the USA and the USSR. In short, there would have been no constraint placed upon American global adventurism" - That's really dumb for more reasons than I care to list, but I think we all know what they are.
ReplyDeleteWe don't "all know" what you're trying to get across. Please articulate your point. If someone as erudite as Bolton has said something "really dumb", you ought to be able to express yourself more effectively.
DeleteIt was my understanding that Stalin had started "noticing" things post war and became increasingly suspicious of Jews after that, and that this resulted in their actually targeting him.
ReplyDelete"Many such cases"...